Trial graphics play a crucial role in presenting evidence in a legal trial, as they have the power to convey complex information to a judge or jury in a visually compelling way. However, it is not enough to simply display a chart or diagram without any explanation. Without proper context, trial graphics can easily be misinterpreted or manipulated, leading to confusion or skepticism among the audience.

One of the main reasons why trial graphics need to be explained is that they can be misleading without additional information. For example, if a chart shows a spike in sales for a particular product, it may seem impressive on its own. However, without considering the market conditions or other relevant factors, it may not actually be relevant to the case. Similarly, a map showing the locations of various incidents may appear damning, but without an explanation of how those incidents relate to the defendant's actions, it may not be persuasive.

By providing a clear explanation of why a particular graphic is being presented, the presenter can help the audience understand its significance and avoid any misunderstandings. This is particularly important in cases where the evidence is complex or technical, such as in patent or intellectual property disputes. Trial graphics can help break down intricate information into more easily digestible pieces, but only if they are accompanied by clear explanations of what they represent and why they matter.

Another important reason why trial graphics need to be explained is that they can be used to tell a compelling story that supports the presenter's argument. By carefully selecting and arranging the data, the presenter can create a narrative that resonates with the judge or jury. However, without an explanation of how the graphics fit into that narrative, the audience may not fully appreciate the argument being made. In cases where the evidence is ambiguous or open to interpretation, the presenter's story may ultimately be the deciding factor in the outcome of the case.

Furthermore, explaining trial graphics helps to build the presenter's credibility with the audience. By demonstrating a thorough understanding of the evidence and how it supports their argument, the presenter establishes themselves as a knowledgeable and trustworthy source of information. This aspect is particularly important in cases where the presenter's credibility may be questioned due to personal or financial interests in the outcome.

Trial graphics can be a powerful tool in presenting evidence in a legal trial, but they must be accompanied by clear explanations of why they are being presented and what they mean for the case. Providing context, telling a compelling story, and building credibility with the audience are essential elements in persuading judges and juries to see the case from the presenter's perspective. Without proper explanation, trial graphics may do more harm than good, leaving the audience confused or skeptical about their relevance to the case.

Related A2L Consulting articles on the subject of trial presentation, juries, and storytelling:

• Free Download: Storytelling for Litigators - How to Get GREAT at It
• 5 Things Every Jury Needs From You
• 10 Things Every Mock Jury Has Said
• Five-part series on jury selection
• Trial presentation tips anyone can learn from Hollywood
• Graphically immersive trial presentations work best
• Alternative Fee Arrangements for trial presentation services
• 14 completely preventable trial presentation mistakes
• How do trial presentation consultants do what they do?