by Ken Lopez Founder/CEO A2L Consulting
Mock trials are an essential part of the legal system, providing a valuable opportunity for lawyers and clients to prepare for real trials. By simulating the experience of a trial, mock trials allow participants to identify potential problems and weaknesses in their case, helping them to refine their strategies and arguments. However, like any process, legal mock trials can be affected by a variety of problems that can impact their effectiveness and accuracy. In this blog post, we will explore nine common issues with legal mock trials and discuss strategies for avoiding them.
Jury consultants and trial consultants are essential resources for attorneys preparing for trials. These professionals employ a range of techniques to assist attorneys in selecting the most suitable jurors and presenting their cases in a compelling and effective manner. However, there is a ongoing debate surrounding whether these consultants provide an unfair advantage in the courtroom.
When it comes to being an expert witness in court, there are certain things that should never be said. These statements not only have the potential to damage your credibility but can also harm your case. As an expert witness, it is crucial to maintain professionalism, objectivity, and transparency throughout your testimony. Here are some additional statements that you should avoid making in court to ensure the effectiveness of your testimony:
1. Maintain a professional appearance
by Ken Lopez Founder/CEO A2L Consulting
When it comes to employment litigation, the stakes can be high. Whether you are an employer or employee, having the right representation can make all the difference in winning your case. But what if the opposition is represented by a union? This can certainly add an extra layer of complexity to your case, but there are steps you can take to win over a jury and come out on top.
Trial graphics play a crucial role in presenting evidence in a legal trial, as they have the power to convey complex information to a judge or jury in a visually compelling way. However, it is not enough to simply display a chart or diagram without any explanation. Without proper context, trial graphics can easily be misinterpreted or manipulated, leading to confusion or skepticism among the audience.
Trial lawyers often rely on their instincts and experience to determine which potential jurors might be good or bad for their case. However, research and post-trial jury interviews have shown that these instincts can often be misguided and false. Many attorneys have shared stories of jurors who turned out to be unexpectedly favorable or unfavorable to their case, proving that preconceived impressions about jurors can be unreliable.
Voir dire is a crucial phase in any trial. It is the process of selecting a jury, where both the prosecution and the defense counsel have the opportunity to question potential jurors, and decide whether or not they would be impartial and fair in their judgment. During this process, the lawyers are allowed to use a limited number of strikes to remove potential jurors from the jury pool. The strategic use of these voir dire strikes can make or break a case. In this article, we will discuss how to use your voir dire strikes strategically.
Share: