<img height="1" width="1" alt="" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1482979731924517&amp;ev=PixelInitialized">

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share:

The 5 Biggest Issues in Patent Law Right Now

by Ryan H. Flax, Esq. (Former) Managing Director, Litigation Consulting A2L Consulting

Read More

Share:

As humans, we're always comparing ourselves to others. We compare our intelligence, our looks, our careers, and our achievements. We're always looking for ways to measure ourselves against others, to see how we stack up. One comparison that has been made time and time again is between lawyers and movie writers. It's a comparison that's been debated for years, with arguments on both sides. Some people believe that lawyers are smarter than movie writers, while others believe the opposite. In this blog post, we'll explore the topic and try to come to a conclusion. First, let's look at the argument in favor of lawyers being smarter than movie writers. The main argument is that lawyers have to go through a long and grueling education process before they can practice law. They have to study for years, pass multiple exams, and complete internships before they can even begin to practice law. This process is rigorous and requires a lot of dedication and hard work. On the other hand, movie writers don't have to go through this rigorous education process. They can learn the craft on their own, or through a less rigorous education program. This argument suggests that lawyers are smarter because they have had to go through a more rigorous education process. However, this argument is flawed. Just because someone goes through a rigorous education process doesn't necessarily mean that they're smarter. It just means that they've gone through a rigorous education process. Additionally, there are many other factors that contribute to intelligence, such as creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. These skills are just as important as having a rigorous education. In fact, some would argue that creativity and critical thinking are more important than having a rigorous education. So, while lawyers may have gone through a more rigorous education process, that doesn't necessarily mean that they're smarter. Now let's look at the argument in favor of movie writers being smarter than lawyers. The main argument is that movie writers have to be creative and come up with unique and interesting storylines. They have to be able to think outside the box and create characters and worlds that are believable and engaging. This requires a lot of creativity and imagination. Additionally, movie writers have to be able to tell a story in a way that is compelling and makes sense. This requires critical thinking and problem-solving skills. This argument suggests that movie writers are smarter because they have to be creative and think critically. This argument is much stronger than the argument in favor of lawyers being smarter. Creativity and critical thinking are essential skills, not just in the world of movie writing, but in all aspects of life. Being able to think outside the box and come up with unique ideas is a valuable skill that is highly sought after in many industries. Additionally, being able to think critically and problem-solve is an important skill that is necessary for success in any field. So, while lawyers may have a more rigorous education process, that doesn't necessarily mean that they're smarter than movie writers. Another profession that often gets compared to lawyers is tabloid or television writers. Some may argue that lawyers are smarter due to their rigorous training and education, but tabloid or television writers also require a certain level of intelligence and critical thinking skills to create compelling and engaging content. Ultimately, it is important to recognize that intelligence cannot be measured by one's profession or education level alone, and that each profession requires its own unique set of skills and talents. In addition to their education and training, lawyers are also expected to be skilled storytellers. They must be able to present their arguments in a compelling and persuasive manner to judges and juries. This skill is particularly important in the courtroom, where lawyers must be able to capture the attention of their audience and convey complex legal concepts in a way that is easy to understand. While tabloid writers, TV writers, and movie writers may also be skilled at crafting stories, lawyers have the added challenge of doing so within the confines of legal parameters and ethical considerations.

Read More

Share:

by Ken Lopez Founder/CEO A2L Consulting We often work on large cases, and large cases often have joint defense teams. A joint defense team is simply a group of law firms working for a group of clients and/or working on some issues together in a case. Some joint defense teams work together brilliantly. It's like watching the best NFL players come together for the Pro Bowl game when each of them plays as a member of the same team. In a trial, sometimes the whole “dream team” unites to prevail. It's a beautiful thing to watch -- when it works. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work that way very often. In a recent engagement I watched a well-organized team in the run-up to trial perform beautifully. They had sorted out communication, who handled what issues, leadership, client communications, and billing arrangements with no apparent drama. I can contrast that with any number of large cases where the opposite is true. These are unfortunately the majority of joint defense efforts. In these cases, turf battles are common. As much time is spent on politics as is spent on winning the case. I suspect cases have been lost entirely because a joint defense effort has failed.

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share:

by Ken Lopez Founder/CEO A2L Consulting

Read More

Share:

by Ken Lopez Founder/CEO A2L Consulting

Read More

Share:

by Ken Lopez Founder/CEO A2L Consulting

Read More

Share:

Read More

Share: