Explore the most captivating and insightful litigation consulting articles that drew the interest of tens of thousands of readers in 2024. With nearly 1,000 articles on our site covering a wide range of litigation consulting topics, I find it beneficial to occasionally pause and review what our audience is engaging with. These are the top articles, as determined by your readership, in 2024. The Evolution of Litigation Consulting in 2024 The landscape of litigation consulting has undergone significant transformations in 2024. With advancements in technology, this year has seen pivotal changes that have reshaped the industry. Our readers have shown a keen interest in understanding how these developments impact litigation strategies and outcomes. Our articles have covered topics ranging from the integration of AI in legal practices to the increasing importance of storytelling as a persuasion tool. The insights provided by our expert contributors have been invaluable in navigating these changes, making these topics some of the most viewed of the year. The Top 24 Litigation Consulting Report Articles in 2024 21 Secrets From an Opening Statement Guru: Learn the 21 secrets of crafting a winning opening statement in litigation. Discover the importance of storytelling, simplifying your message, and practicing diligently for success. Trial Graphics and PowerPoint: Learn how PowerPoint can be a powerful tool for creating trial graphics in litigation consulting. Discover how it simplifies complex concepts, creates compelling visuals, and enhances persuasive arguments. Find out why PowerPoint is accessible and adaptable for collaboration. Avoid common mistakes and explore expert tips for using PowerPoint effectively in trial presentations. 9 Hidden Skills of Trial Technicians and Hotseaters You Never Knew About: Discover the hidden skills of trial technicians and hotseaters in this insightful post. Learn about their unique abilities beyond technical support in the courtroom.
Like the well-known character Pinocchio, some lawyers and their trial graphics experts are not always truthful. Unfortunately, their noses don't grow to reveal their deceit, so it's up to you to identify when they're being dishonest. This article aims to equip you with the tools to do just that—spot those who mislead with charts and trial graphics and, ideally, expose them in court. Alternatively, you could hire Persuadius to save time and energy, allowing you to focus on what you excel at. Clarity and accuracy are crucial in a court of law, but trial graphics can be manipulated to distort the truth. Misleading charts and visual data presentations are often used to sway the judgment of judges and jurors, making it essential for legal professionals to be vigilant. Here are the top 10 tactics your opponent might use to mislead the judge and jury through trial graphics trickery, and how you can spot them. 1. Misleading Scales and Axes on Trial Graphics One of the most common tricks in chart manipulation involves altering the scales and axes. By stretching or compressing the y-axis, a slight difference in data can appear much larger or smaller than it actually is. For instance, a bar chart with a truncated y-axis (which doesn't start at zero) can make minor differences appear significant. Alternatively, using non-uniform intervals on the axes can distort the perception of trends, making data points look disproportionately close or far apart. Below, the creators of this chart wanted to create the impression that iOS has more market than Android. That's not true. I don't understand why, but it's not true. They achieve this by leaving off the bottom 75% of data and indicating that Android holds 85% (at least according to this chart) of the market. The actual numbers are roughly 71% (Android) versus 28% (iOS). Defensive Tip: Always check if the scale is consistent and fair. A quick glance at the axis values and intervals can reveal if something is amiss.
Delving into the role fear plays in shaping and influencing legal and political decisions, I examine its impact on various decision-making processes, ranging from the verdicts delivered by judges and juries to the how voters make decisions about a candidate. Fear, as a potent emotional force, can subtly or overtly sway the outcomes of elections and legal proceedings, affecting how evidence is perceived, how arguments are weighed, and, ultimately, how people make decisions. By understanding the dynamics of fear within the courtroom, we can gain insights into how it can alter the course of legal decisions, potentially leading to outcomes that prioritize perceived safety and security over strict adherence to legal principles and factual evidence. This exploration seeks to uncover the underlying psychological mechanisms through which fear operates, offering a comprehensive view of its pervasive influence in the legal arena.
As the United States gears up for another presidential election day, the political landscape is influencing voters and the foundations of the justice system. The dynamics of a high-stakes election can seep into courtrooms, affecting jury perceptions and potentially influencing verdicts. This blog post explores the intricate relationship between presidential races and the functioning of juries, examining how political ideologies, media narratives, and public sentiment can shape the decisions of those tasked with delivering justice. Political Polarization and Jury Dynamics In recent years, the U.S. has witnessed increasing political polarization, with citizens becoming more entrenched in their beliefs and less willing to entertain opposing viewpoints. This polarization extends to juries, where jurors' political beliefs can influence their perceptions of cases, particularly those involving contentious social issues. For instance, cases related to police conduct, civil rights, and public health can take on heightened significance in an election year, as jurors may view them through the lens of their political affiliations. Research has shown jurors with strong political beliefs may be more likely to empathize with defendants or plaintiffs who align with their views. For example, during a presidential election, when issues of immigration are front and center, a juror who holds strong anti-immigration sentiments may be less sympathetic to an undocumented defendant facing charges. Conversely, a juror who champions immigrant rights may exhibit bias in favor of the defendant. This phenomenon underscores the need for careful jury selection.
In the courtroom, a picture can indeed be worth a thousand words. Trial graphics are revolutionizing the way jurors understand and retain complex information by transforming abstract concepts into tangible visuals. These graphics serve as powerful tools that break down intricate data into more digestible formats, making it easier for jurors to follow the narrative of a case. Whether it's through detailed charts, immersive 3D animations, or interactive timelines, trial graphics play a crucial role in bridging the gap between complicated evidence and juror comprehension, ultimately enhancing the overall effectiveness of legal presentations. The Evolution of Trial Graphics in Modern Courtrooms The use of trial graphics in courtrooms has evolved from simple chalkboard drawings to sophisticated digital presentations. In the early days, trial graphics were rudimentary, often consisting of basic sketches or hand-drawn diagrams on chalkboards or paper. These early trial graphics served the basic purpose of illustrating key points in a case, helping to clarify testimony and evidence for the jury. However, they were limited in scope and detail, often requiring significant explanation from attorneys to convey their full meaning.
This is by far the most important e-book we have ever launched, setting a new standard in the industry with its unparalleled depth and breadth. Spanning an impressive 559 pages, it encompasses nearly everything we know about the art of persuasion through trial graphics and litigation graphics. I am beyond excited to introduce this revolutionary book for 2024. The book is titled Winning With Trial Graphics and Litigation Graphics: A Trial Lawyer's Handbook, and I am thrilled to unveil it to trial attorneys and their support teams. This e-book is an updated edition of our highly acclaimed 2014 version, which has set the benchmark in the industry for the past decade. In this new release, we’ve enriched the content with over 100 fresh articles on trial graphics, litigation graphics, storytelling, and the science of persuasion, making it an invaluable asset for legal professionals. You can download this 559-page book without any obligations by clicking here.
PowerPoint does funny things to people. For some, it is an amazingly accessible creative space to deliver important messages powerfully and persuasively (see Wait, Why is Powerpoint Cool Now). For others, it is a place to advertise how little they know about persuasion science. Think of this article as a fun challenge reminiscent of the games found on cereal boxes from your childhood. Your task: spot the persuasion-killing mistakes on the slide above, then compare them to the ones I've highlighted below. I've already embedded numerous persuasion pitfalls in the text, making it easier for you to identify them. Let's see how many you can uncover and elevate your persuasion game. Hopefully, this slide doesn't resemble your Trial Graphics/Litigation Graphics. If it does, you should contact me or press the request conflicts check button in the corner. In any case, I hope this article helps you and helps elevate the art of persuasion.
If you’ve been following our blog for a while, you may have let some amazing posts slip under your radar. With over 12 years of blog posts and an impressive 850 entries, it’s easy to miss a few hidden gems. That’s why we’ve compiled this curated list of captivating blog posts that deserve recognition.
80% of jury trials are won or lost in the opening statement. 80%!!!!!!
The Trump trial in New York has been discussed for months. With the jury selection process well underway, several things have gone wrong that could potentially impact the trial's outcome. In this blog post, I'll discuss seven of these issues. 1. Jury members with biases: Finding unbiased and fair jurors is one of the most significant challenges during jury selection. In the case of the Trump trial, potential jurors may have already formed an opinion about the defendant due to the extensive media coverage of the trial. The political climate surrounding the case could also lead to jurors having predetermined notions about the defendant, which could impact their ability to be impartial during the trial. As of this writing, two potential jurors who were already selected have been removed. 12 jurors have already been selected, with Friday dedicated to selecting alternate jurors in case any of the chosen jurors are dismissed. See Font Matters - A Trial Graphics Consultant's Trick to Overcome Bias. 2. Jurors who have already formed an opinion: During the pretrial phase, so much media coverage about the case could influence potential jurors. If potential jurors have already made up their minds about the case, it could impact their ability to remain impartial during the trial. This could lead to jurors not being open to hearing the evidence presented during the trial, which could impact the outcome. For those jurors, the trial would be one extensive exercise in confirmation bias. 3. Jurors have been doxxed: Doxxing, the act of revealing personal information about individuals online, has already proven to be a significant issue during the jury selection process for the Trump trial. This unethical practice can make potential jurors feel exposed and vulnerable, impacting their ability to participate in the trial impartially. With the constant threat of personal information being leaked, jurors may feel pressured or intimidated, affecting their decision-making process. It is crucial for the court to address and prevent any instances of doxxing to ensure a fair and unbiased trial for all parties involved.
Preparing for a mock trial can be daunting, especially if you're unsure how to proceed. That's where a jury consultant comes in. A good jury consultant can help you prepare for a mock trial in various ways. In this blog post, I'll discuss 12 things your jury consultant should do to help you prepare. 1. Developing a Theme One of the first things your jury consultant should do is help you develop a theme for your case. A theme is an overarching idea that ties together all the evidence and arguments in your case. Developing a theme early on can help you stay focused and create a more compelling narrative for the jury. See 14 Differences Between a Theme and a Story in Litigation. 2. Conducting Focus Groups Focus groups are a powerful tool for testing your case theory and identifying potential weaknesses. Your jury consultant should be skilled at conducting focus groups and be able to provide you with valuable insights into how jurors are likely to react to your case. See How Early-Stage Focus Groups Can Help Your Trial Preparation.
I often talk about what not to do, but sometimes, I must remember to mention what you should do to achieve success at trial. In honor of leap year 2024, I have written this article offering 29 tips for successful trial preparation and execution. You can use this list as a checklist to compare yourself to your peers. I did not develop these ideas alone. Instead, they come from my experience working with the best of you over the past 30 years. 1. Conduct a mock trial. The very best litigators always conduct a mock trial when at least $10 million is at stake. Mock trials are a critical part of the Persuadius service offerings. If you want to discuss one, I invite you to email me (ken@persuadius.com) or call me (1-800-847-9330) or, ideally, fill out a client conflict check form by clicking the purple button in the upper right corner of this page. Only three people, including me, see those. 2. Conduct more than one mock trial. The ideal number is three, and that's precisely what I have observed the best trial lawyers do. It's not always affordable, but more than one mock is mandatory for cases with $25 million or more at stake. The only thing that varies is the investment in each mock trial. If $100 million or more is at stake, every mock should have every investment possible (i.e., a proper mock facility, a two-day or three-day mock, live witnesses, opening and closing statements, etc.). 3. Collaborate with litigation consultants who bring experience and insights to trial preparation. With a track record of handling hundreds of trials, we have witnessed exceptional and lackluster attorney performances. We aim to share valuable knowledge and advice, not lecture or boast about expertise. Drawing on the collective wisdom of countless cases, we strive to support you in crafting a solid and effective trial strategy. Litigation consultants can be exceptionally helpful when developing your opening statement. 4. Build a solid opening statement. In 30 years, I haven't seen anything to convince me that the opening statement is not the most essential part of the case. Some studies say that 80% of jurors make a decision about who will win after hearing opening statements. When done correctly, it should take months to develop an opening. It should be tested many times in whatever way your client can afford. We've written extensively about this. This topic is wonderfully covered in our opening statement toolkit ebook. See The Opening Statement Toolkit.
I have the privilege of working with some of the most skilled trial lawyers in the country. They are an impressive group, possessing extensive knowledge of the law, unwavering work ethic, and expertise in the courtroom. In addition, they have an intangible charisma that allows them to command a room the moment they enter. Great trial lawyers can establish a magnetic rapport with judges and jurors that is awe-inspiring and hard to explain. As a trial consultant, we should observe this connection and let it propel us to victory. Because of this natural charisma, many top trial lawyers worry that when they use PowerPoint slides to supplement their opening statements, judges and jurors may lose the personal connection they have worked their whole lives to learn. They point out, or I observe, that judges' and jurors' attention is often still fixed on the screen, even if they want to move on to the point not included in the slides. Should the jurors continue focusing on the screen or shift their attention to the lawyer? I know what we want them to do, and all too often, they do the opposite. This is no trivial concern. There is something called the split attention effect, where audiences need help figuring out where to look and end up not remembering anything. There's also a closely related redundancy effect describing when lawyers show and read text. Again, the audiences remember less than they would have had you shown or read the text. You are not alone if you do this. I counsel on this topic very often.
PROS: PowerPoint is a versatile tool that many lawyers use for creating trial graphics. It can be used to create visual aids that can help present arguments in a clear and concise way. While there are many tools available for creating trial graphics, PowerPoint is a popular choice due to its ease of use, flexibility, and accessibility. Using PowerPoint for trial graphics can help simplify complex concepts and make arguments more compelling. For instance, you can use PowerPoint to create timelines, charts, graphs, and other visuals that can help illustrate key points. This is particularly important in cases where multiple parties, complex facts, or technical details need to be presented to the jury.
Share: